Feed on
Posts
Comments
Work it, kiddo!

Work it, kiddo!

I have this very strong, distinct memory of my mother, probably not too long after she gave birth to my little brother, watching Jack LaLanne on TV and following along. I’m not sure why I was home (I was in second grade when my brother made the scene), but there I was with her, in our Totally 70s Den (braided rug, dark paneling, orange drapes on the sliding glass doors, Colonial furniture including a dark-wood-frame couch whose cushion fabric featured some sort of bird theme.) It was fun, kicking up my legs and touching my toes and doing whatever else LaLanne urged his viewers to do, but it was also cool to be doing it with my mom.

My mom’s always been big into exercise, and I (and my sister; our brother didn’t catch that gene, somehow) follow in her footsteps. Part of it is a complete inability to “diet,” so I have to work out vigorously to keep on an even keel with weight. But more important, working out is my drug of choice, my mood lifter, and having kids has made exercise absolutely non-negotiable. The algorithm is devastatingly simple: Mama hasn’t worked out in a couple of days? Stay away. Mom just got back from an invigorating run or a trip to the gym? Happiness ensues! Continue Reading »

Spoiled Rotten?

Spoiling. Wow, what a hotbutton topic. Right now, as I type, I’m listening to the Brian Lehrer show, on my local NPR radio station (WNYC; I listen to it streaming live on WNYC.org). He’s talking to Rufus Griscom, the founder of the parenting website Babble.com. Babble has a column called “Bad Parent,” and he’s been on Lehrer’s show every Thursday this month, chatting about different so-called “taboos” of parenting.

Far as I’m concerned, some of these “taboos” are more or less the everyday here in Chez Mean Mom. I’ve enjoyed these segments because they show me that “bad” (a.k.a. mean) parenting is back! But I digress. Continue Reading »

Are your kids always fishing for food?

Are your kids always fishing for food?

There’s nothing like being validated, is there? Especially, I have to say, by the New York Times.

Just yesterday, a friend of mine sent me a link to a story in the Times about — wait for it — how kids today snack too much.

Yeah, been there, said that.

The writer, Jennifer Steinhauer, herself a parent, laments how kids can never go anywhere or do anything without snacks being involved. And it’s not just the pretzels, Goldfish and juice boxes moms stash in our bags (just in case of low blood sugar and/or a meltdown) while we’re out and about with kids. It’s also the amount of times we’re asked, as moms, to provide snack for this or that activity or event or meeting.

I fully understand the point of some snacks, as I wrote months ago, when this blog was still new. I get that toddler tummies are tiny, and it’s hard for little ones to manage the long stretch between breakfast and lunch, or lunch and dinner, without a tiding-over. I get that snacks can strategically fill in nutritional gaps (didn’t finish his breakfast milk? A 10 a.m. cheese stick or yogurt is a good calcium-and-vitamin-D boost).

What I don’t get, and never will, is the idea that kids of all ages need food to accompany just about anything they do. Let’s stop calling snacks anything virtuous (the tummy-tider-over; the nutritional gap-filler), and be honest: we use snacks as an event in themselves; a boredom-buster; a tantrum-avoider (hence, as my friend Gretchen told me, the growing number of parents who bring snacks church–as though you can’t ask a 5-year-old to go foodless for an hour. In church).

Snacks are a crutch.

You can’t go a soccer game without a snack. Sure, they play hard, so the orange slices and water bottles at half-time are good. But the Munchkins after? Apparently, my friend Susan told me, you can’t go to a Brownie or Girl Scout meeting without a little somethin’-somethin’ either (I have boys; hence, no Brownies, and I haven’t broached the world of Cub scouting yet). Says Susan, a 7:30 pm Brownie meeting for a bunch of first-graders must be aided and abetted by donuts and cookies. Really? Didn’t they just have dinner? Don’t they have to go to bed, like, soon? You can’t go to a Mommy & Me class without food. My younger son James was in a gymnastics class a couple of years ago, and he was the only one who left after the hour of tumbling and balancing; everyone else had signed up for a second hour of crafts. And … a snack.

I am quick to add here, my kids do get snacks. Of course they get them at school because frankly I think I’d be hauled up in front of a very disapproving PTA if I didn’t send in my second-grader and kindergartner with their daily snacks (along with lunch). I agree with that, and I’m a big fan of our principal, who frowns on junky snacks, and both my sons’ teachers this year, who have stressed that the kids should bring in water, not juice, for snack (probably more to avoid sticky spills on desks than for health, but I’ll take it!).  I have bought vending-machine fare for the boys as a treat (though I steer them to pretzels and popcorn, and away from candy bars and Pop-Tarts, and I often require them to hang on to the goodies until after dinner. They comply).

How do you feel about the ubiquitous culture of snacks? Not about the necessary, between-meals, nutritious snacks, but the “here, kid, have a dollar for the vending machine because I can’t bear to hear you whining any more” snacks? Can your kids get together with an organized group without sniffing around for juice and cookies?

Quick: What does this cry mean?

Quick: What does this cry mean?

I have a brand-new nephew, Nicholas (Nico, for short). His parents, my brother and sister-in-law, are mostly going minimal when it comes to baby gear. Part of that is a space issue–their house is  pretty compact. But a bigger part of it is that, from what I can tell, and not including having read probably four million books on pregnancy, birth, and babycare (they approach most things fairly intellectually), they plan to rely largely on instinct. (And by the way, the photo above is not little Nico, but stay tuned to the end of this post for a gratuitous, isn’t-he-the-cutest photo of the latest member of my rapidly expanding family).

As any of us who’ve given birth can attest, babies themselves are born with a host of fascinating and useful instincts. They can grasp a finger, even with their toes (shades of our simian ancestors!). A newborn placed on his mother’s belly will scootch his way up toward her breast–the urge to feed and the intoxicating, familiar scent of the mother is so strong. Even lying in bed beside his lactating mother, a newborn–who otherwise can’t really roll over–can roll himself toward her. They may need some help nursing here and there, but they know how to suck. For seven-or-so-pound, comma-shaped beings, they have pretty amazing abilities to figure out what they need to do, and do it.

So why do their parents, upon having children, seem to lose all instinct? Continue Reading »

We had quite the day on New Year’s Eve. We woke to a snowstorm, which we drove through, slipping and sliding, for an hour to reach a lawyer’s office in a town that’s normally a 20-minute drive away. We were closing on a refinance of our home mortgage, a process that had taken many frustrating months and literally reams of paper (you’d think much of this could be done digitally, but alas, no). We’d gotten several extensions of our locked-in rate, the last of which expired on that day, so there was no option left: We had to drag the boys (no available babysitters) to a boring law office on a snowy day.

This stapler? About the most exciting thing in a law office, from the boys' perspective.

This stapler? About the most exciting thing in a law office, from the boys' perspective.

And there we sat, in a conference room, waiting for the closer to gather her stack of papers and Wite-Out and stapler (seriously, folks; digitize. Let’s go paperless!) and get the process started. While we were waiting, and out of the clear blue, Daniel began complaining of an earache.

Meltdown city? In fact, no. Continue Reading »

Give me an S!

Give me an S!

So, I didn’t change my name when I married my dear husband just over 9 years ago. Surprised? No one who knew me was, but I’m continually surprised at the hoopla it causes even now. Or maybe especially now, with our two sons firmly entrenched in the local public school system. But more on school later.

First, here’s why I did it (or, to be precise, didn’t do it):

  • I like my name. I always have. I like that it reflects my Italian-American heritage, even though it’s not immediately obvious to everyone that it’s even an Italian surname (and to that end, I did a little research: Schipani probably originates in Calabria, the region that occupies the toe of Italy’s boot. That fits, because Calabria is where my Schipani great-grandfather immigrated from. But curiously, it also might be, even further back in time, Albanian). See? History and the natural ambiguity built into history. What’s not to love?
  • I like being a Schipani. There are people in our ancestral line (OK,  only as far back as my own father can remember) whose likes and dislikes, senses of humor and hobbies and penchants, echo mine. That feels good to me. I didn’t want to jettison the name that makes me feel tethered to that past.
  • I had my name for a long time before I met my husband. Specifically, nearly 33 years. I was 34 when we got married. I’d been using my name as an adult for long enough that it would’ve felt abrupt to just become someone else.
  • It’s tied to my professional identity. As a magazine editor and writer, I’m connected, quite literally, to my name. People recongnize it on mastheads and in bylines, and these days (not the case when I began my writing career more than 20 years ago) on Google.
  • Did I mention I just like it? I like that it’s a little hard to pronounce or to spell (for some people, that is. I mean, I learned it when I was four or five. My seven-year-old can spell it now, too). Continue Reading »

I Suck at Sick Days.

I feel my temperature rising...

I feel my temperature rising...

I’m going to make a major admission here: I’m not very good at being at home with my kids. I’m not looking for either condemnation or sympathy; it’s simply a fact of my personality. And knowing this fact for sure has been what’s made me able to create my working-and-family life “balance” (which I put in quotes because as any parent knows, there’s no such thing as balance; it tips back and forth maddeningly) with a minimum of guilt.

So I work and my kids go to school (and before full-time school, I relied on daycare, which I still kinda miss because they had longer hours there than they do at school now). I realize I’m extraordinarily fortunate that I have a career I can fit (better word: stuff, or shoehorn) into school hours, with random extra hours at night or on the weekends if need be. I’m also fortunate that when I did have them in daycare, I found one that was both excellent and affordable.

I’ve written about my determination to not be a guilty working mom before, and I stand by that. Sometimes I feel like a voice in the wilderness, telling anyone who will listen that I don’t feel guilty, that a working mom is the woman I am, not a forced situation or an uncomfortable compromise. I don’t feel that making my work a priority (for the money, yes, but also because it’s who I am) automatically makes my responsibility as a parent less of a priority. My children are top of mind, and consume the majority of my heart, all the time. It’s just that that mind, and that heart, exist in a person who must, must, must work for a living, and must feel free to derive personal and professional enjoyment and satisfaction from that work. Continue Reading »

Hermey and Rudolph: Misfits with bad fathers

Hermey and Rudolph: Misfits with bad fathers

The other day, on impulse at the supermarket, I picked up the DVD of “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” for the boys. They hadn’t seen it yet, even though it’s been on TV. Both of them are rehearsing holiday songs for their school concerts, so it’s been a nonstop chorus of Rudolph over here, and I figured it was better to own the dang thing than to sit through commercials.

So we watched. And while James tucked his head under a blanket whenever the Bumble came on the screen, and Daniel laughed over my favorite character, Yukon Cornelius, I was taken back in time to the 70s, remembering watching with my sister on the oval braided rug in the den (small time-travel aside here: did others of you raised in the 1970s do all your TV-watching on the floor/rug, rather than the couch? Did the couch in your house, as in mine, have an “adults only” vibe? Weird).

The story is full of you’d-never-see-that-on-TV-today oddities. And I’m not talking about laughable “special effects” or the way the characters’ mouth movements never match their dialog. I’m talking about a reindeer father who is awfully mean to his misfit, red-nosed son, entreating him to hide his differences and fit in. Then what does the dad do, when he realizes his shunned and ridiculed child has run off? He mans up and goes after him, telling his anxious wife to stay in the cave, not for the sensible reason that Rudolph might come back, but because going out in the storm to search is “man’s work.”

Then there’s poor Hermey, the misfit elf who wants to be a dentist. His stand-in father is the head elf, who rages at his “son” who wants to be anything other than what he’s supposed to be. He, too, apologizes in the end and lets Hermey set up a North Pole dental practice, but his original sin — fatherly non-acceptance — is one that you’d never see in kids’ fictional fare today.

Last night, I was on the phone with my sister, and we talked about the show. I said, “If that were made today, the message would be ‘celebrate your differences,’ not, ’shun the misfits.’ ” And sure, that’s eventually the lesson that’s learned in Rudolph, but the key difference is that before Rudolph can realize his oddity makes him special, he first has to be disparaged and cast out, not just by his peers, but by his own father. In the end, forgiveness is instant. And you get the idea that no one needs therapy.

Did we just miss that part as kids? No, we really didn’t, as my sister pointed out.  “We knew the father, and even Santa, was mean to Rudolph,” she said. And we pretty much thought, ‘well, that’s the way it is.’ ” And then we got on with our day.

Today, however, that show wouldn’t be made because we couldn’t stand the idea of our kids being shown a less-than-ideal parent while they were watching a TV show or movie. Sure, we’ll allow them to be temporarily frightened when the Bumble roars or, King Kong-like, grasps a struggling doe in his giant paw. We can allow them the temporary anxiety of wondering if Yukon makes it out alive, or if Christmas will be canceled like a flight out of O’Hare. Scary is acceptable.

What’s not acceptable any longer are adults who get it wrong, then apologize in the end, as Donner does to Rudolph after he saves Christmas. TV and movie parents don’t screw up. They make cookies and laugh indulgently and otherwise remain more or less benignly in the background as their kids (whether they’re reindeer, pigs, turtles or little bears) mess up, make messes, and sometimes learn lessons. But they’d never, ever, ever call their child a misfit. Even if they said they were sorry.

Back in the 70s, on that braided rug, safe in the paneled walls of our den, with our parents behind us on the couch, my sister and I watched, got scared, then felt good again, and my folks didn’t give a second thought to the negative depiction of parenthood in this once-yearly bit of holiday fun. They just yawned and sent us to off to bed.

Why do we seem to believe, as my sister pointed out, that our kids can’t comprehend and mentally manage the fact that sometimes parents aren’t perfectly nice, that they mess up and apologize, sometimes over and over for the same crimes? Why don’t we give them that credit? Why, instead do we give them entertainment that whitewashes parents into mistake-free creations that the kids run roughshod over?

Back then, Donner could apologize with a manly clanking of his antlers. Today, he’d be getting a visit from the Department of Children’s Services. Or, more likely, he’d have started out being the kind of dad who gave his misfit son a sentimental lecture on how that red nose made Rudolph special.

Apparently, fictional parents are no longer allowed to bumble their way to the right thing. They have to be perfect from the get-go.

What do you think?

what's in the box?

what's in the box?

I don’t know who or what deserves the credit for this (though I’m happy to take it!), but my boys have had to be coaxed and prodded to come up with ideas for what they want for Christmas (which is the gift-giving holiday we celebrate in these parts). Is it my strictness? My older son’s natural semi-obliviousness (he really does live a lot of time inside his precious head)? Non-commercial TV?

I’ve written before about how I don’t buy many (or any) toys, which has led to a relatively sparse playroom. That’s changed in the time since I wrote it, largely because I’ve expanded the boys’ birthday-party experiences to other kids, not solely family (because in my family, the predominant gift is clothes and other necessities, or at least it was in the first few years of their lives, for which I’ve been grateful). So now they do have toys and games, but still they don’t sit around asking me for stuff, or grabbing the Toys R Us circular from the Sunday paper and pointing out their faves. In fact, a couple weeks ago, I showed them the Big Book of Toys or whatever R Us calls it, and they sort of lost interest.

Which does not mean they are not interested in toys; they are. But they aren’t knocking down Santa’s door listing the gifts they expect to receive. The ideas so far:

  • Daniel: a microphone. A camera like mom’s.
  • James: Cars racecars.

…aaaand, that’s it.

What do I want? Things I’m not getting anytime soon, if ever, such as a mudroom off my kitchen and my formerly-taut midsection. Things that are truly impossible, like more time in my week. And things that seem possible, but remain just out of reach. Like patience. And compassion, and peace.

Many years ago, my dad, at our request, made a short wish list. It read:

  • socks
  • shirts
  • apres ski boots
  • peace on earth

I don’t have perfect recall on this, but I’m pretty sure he at least got the socks.

Here’s what I’ll probably get for the boys: More Cars cars, and maybe something to keep them all in. Something art-related, and some books. Some chocolates and little toys for the stockings. A microphone (Daniel wants it, but they’ll sort-of share it). And my old digital camera, with a new battery and memory card to spruce it up.

Here’s what I want to give them:

  • more years of un-greedy humility
  • more time with their family, both young and old
  • a desire, at least, for peace on earth

What are your gift plans for your children?

What's good for Fido...

What's good for Fido...

Did anyone see this article in the New York Times’ Style section the other day? It’s by Alex Williams, it’s titled Becoming the Alpha Dog in Your Own Home, and woo, boy did I get a good laugh over it. In a good way, I assure you! The story is about how some  parents today have hit on the bright idea of incorporating principles of dog training into their discipline efforts.

The idea is based on the work of Cesar Millan, the so-called Dog Whisperer, who has a TV show (disclosure: I’ve never watched the show; I don’t have a dog, and truth be told, I’m not much of a dog person, but that’s another story), a book, and a rabidly (sorry!)  devoted following of families with formerly out-of-control pooches. Y’know, I’ve never watched SuperNanny, either, but I don’t think I’m going out on a limb here to say that the Super Nanny and the Dog Whisperer basically have the same message. Which is:

You’re in charge. You, the taller one, the one who walks upright on two legs. Not the four-legged one, and not the one or ones who exist somewhere on the developmental continuum between diapers and SATs (and even quite a bit after the SATs, come to think of it).

Um. Duh? Continue Reading »

Older Posts »